<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cheek and Bluster &#187; sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekandbluster.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Videos of 2011: 5. &#8220;Tiger Woods Fails to Qualify for Sex with Dive Bar Waitress&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2012/01/14/top-10-videos-of-2011-5-tiger-woods-fails-to-qualify-for-sex-with-dive-bar-waitress/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2012/01/14/top-10-videos-of-2011-5-tiger-woods-fails-to-qualify-for-sex-with-dive-bar-waitress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national miscourse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punditiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Onion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=5739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Onion SportsDome didn't last on Comedy Central, but fortunately its hilarious sports-pundit-shouting-match sendup "Get Out of My Face" survives on the web. The inaugural web-based GOOMF rates number 5 on my 2011 videos countdown. <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2012/01/14/top-10-videos-of-2011-5-tiger-woods-fails-to-qualify-for-sex-with-dive-bar-waitress/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/05video-125sq.png" alt="5" title="2011 video #5" width="125" height="125" class="alignright size-full wp-image-5754 colorbox-5739" /><span title="B" class="cap"><span>B</span></span>ack in January of 2011, the reliably hilarious satirical web site The Onion branched out into broadcast TV. <em><a title="TV show page" href="http://www.theonion.com/channels/ifc/" target="_blank">Onion News Network</a></em> was renewed for a second season and can be seen on <a title="Independent Film Channel" href="http://www.ifc.com/" target="_blank">IFC</a>. A second show, <em>Onion SportsDome</em>, appeared on Comedy Central but was cancelled in June. <em>SportsDome</em> can&#8217;t be called a total loss, however, because it produced at least one terrific segment which has continued as a weekly feature on the web.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5742 colorbox-5739" title="goomf_masthead2_500px" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/goomf_masthead2_500px.png" alt="GOOMF masthead" width="500" height="88" /></p>
<p>&#8220;Get Out of My Face&#8221; (often referred to by the delightful acronym &#8220;GOOMF&#8221;) is a brilliant parody of the dick-swinging, rapid fire sports pundit barking match shows which have become a staple for ESPN — ones like <em>Around the Horn</em> and <em>Pardon the Interruption</em>.<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2012/01/14/top-10-videos-of-2011-5-tiger-woods-fails-to-qualify-for-sex-with-dive-bar-waitress/#fn-5739-1' id='fnref-5739-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(5739)'>1</a></sup> The Onion&#8217;s first installment of GOOMF appeared in the summer of 2011, and it laid me out laughing:<span id="more-5739"></span></p>
<p><small>[rated NSFW]</small><br />
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d_Gpq72BOUw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Per <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2215055/combined" title=""Get Out of My Face" on IMDb" target="_blank">IMDb</a>, I am pleased to inform you that the stars of GOOMF are <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0699241/" title="Robb Pruitt on IMDb" target="_blank">Robb Pruitt</a> as Kenny Kennedy and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4267858/" title="Levan Reid on IMDb" target="_blank">Levan Reid</a> as Doc Brooks.</p>
<p>One of the things I love about GOOMF is the deliberate graphic overload, which is barely an exaggeration of the number of shiny bells and whistles that often clutter up the screen on <em>SportsCenter</em>. It&#8217;s impossible to catch all of the silly headlines that scroll by on the bottom-margin news ticker and pay full attention to the characters&#8217; dialogue in a single viewing; if you don&#8217;t have time for multiple viewings of the clip, I transcribed them all <a title="Ticker headlines" class="colorbox-link" href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GOOMFticker.png">here</a> for your quick reading convenience.</p>
<p>For the slightly more serious-minded, the style being parodied in this video was recently the subject of a trenchant article in <em>The Atlantic</em> by Patrick Hruby, entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/01/the-sportscenter-ization-of-political-journalism/250882/" title="Right here" target="_blank">The SportsCenter-ization of Political Journalism</a>.&#8221; The jist:</p>
<blockquote><p>Turn on ESPN. There are score tickers and headline crawls, slick graphics and constant teases for upcoming stories, everything creating a sense of urgent immediacy. Now switch to Fox News. Visually speaking, it&#8217;s the same eyeball-grabbing formula. (Well, replace scores with stock prices, and garrulous sportscaster Chris Berman with a frosted blonde news babe). This is the SportsCenter-ization of the news, in which coverage of Washington &#8212; and the world, really &#8212; apes a glossy entertainment product dedicated to spectacular touchdowns, gee-whiz statistics, prefabricated drama, insta-debates waged by a nattering, revolving-door athletic punditocracy and the very latest updates on Brett Favre&#8217;s various bodily appendages.</p></blockquote>
<p>If the Broncos beat the Patriots later today, watch tomorrow for Fox News to start ginning up a Tim Tebow write-in campaign for the remaining GOP primary states.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/football/" title="football" rel="tag">football</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/national-miscourse/" title="national miscourse" rel="tag">national miscourse</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/news-media/" title="news media" rel="tag">news media</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/punditiots/" title="punditiots" rel="tag">punditiots</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/satire/" title="satire" rel="tag">satire</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/" title="sex" rel="tag">sex</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sports/" title="sports" rel="tag">sports</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/onion/" title="The Onion" rel="tag">The Onion</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/tiger-woods/" title="Tiger Woods" rel="tag">Tiger Woods</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2012/01/14/top-10-videos-of-2011-5-tiger-woods-fails-to-qualify-for-sex-with-dive-bar-waitress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiner Doesn&#8217;t Have a &#8220;Problem,&#8221; He Has a Computer</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2011/06/16/weiner-doesnt-have-a-problem-he-has-a-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2011/06/16/weiner-doesnt-have-a-problem-he-has-a-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[America?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[(in)justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=4476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan Savage's reaction to Weinergate. A taste: "Another reporter asked Weiner if he had a drinking problem. Because you know, only a man who was drunk or on drugs could get caught up in something like this. Do reporters know what men are LIKE?" <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2011/06/16/weiner-doesnt-have-a-problem-he-has-a-computer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><span title="S" class="cap"><span>S</span></span>ex advice sage and blogroll mainstay Dan Savage devoted the first ten minutes of his latest podcast episode to <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/SavageLovePodcast/archives/2011/06/14/savage-love-episode-243">a passionate and astute rant</a> about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/07/us/politics/07weiner.html">Anthony Weiner kerfuffle</a>. I should clarify that Dan&#8217;s commentary was recorded and released two days ago, on June 14; in it he refers specifically to Weiner&#8217;s confessional press conference, which had taken place a week earlier. Weiner&#8217;s resignation from congress didn&#8217;t occur until <a href="http://nyti.ms/mmr1w3">this morning</a>, but it doesn&#8217;t make Dan&#8217;s argument any less relevant.</p>
<div class="image imageright"><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dansavage_flickr-mattoly.jpg"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dansavage_flickr-mattoly-225x299.jpg" alt="dan-savage" title="Dan inserts a microphone into a stuffed animal, 2009" width="225" height="299" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4496 colorbox-4476" /></a>
<p>Dan Savage (photo: Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattoly/3286242561/">mattoly</a>)</p>
</div>
<p>Of course, the full effect is only available by <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/SavageLovePodcast/archives/2011/06/14/savage-love-episode-243">hearing Dan speak his words</a>. Nevertheless, here are some highlights for the benefit of those unable to listen (or who simply prefer to read):</p>
<blockquote><p>My favorite question [at the press conference] was this: &#8220;Why would you do this after you were married?&#8221; Because Lord knows, <em>nobody</em> goes online and flirts &mdash; or masturbates, looks at [or] downloads porn, or creates through the interactive-ness of the web their own porn moments &mdash; no <em>married person</em> does that. The worldwide web is just this big jack-off-a-thon for single people.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-4476"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>You know what? Members of congress, like members of the press, get horny sometimes. And sometimes male members of congress, like male members of the press, think with their dicks. And sometimes married men rub one out with an assist from the worldwide web, my media colleagues! Film at fucking 11!</p>
<p>Weiner was horny and went online and flirted and beat it a few times, like millions of Americans have done and will continue to do, every damn day, forever.</p>
<p>Another reporter asked Weiner if he had a drinking problem. Because you know, only a man who was drunk or on drugs could get caught up in something like this. Do reporters know what men are <em>like?</em> And lots of women too? This desire to pathologize behavior that <em>isn&#8217;t sick</em> &mdash; that is really common, and human, and completely and instantly understandable &mdash; that <em>itself</em> is pathological.</p>
<p>Weiner does not have a &#8220;problem.&#8221; Weiner has <em>a computer</em>. It is the same problem that <em>all</em> Americans these days have: we have computers, and sometimes we make fools of ourselves on them. Think of your own life: think of the shit <em>you&#8217;ve</em> done online. If all of it was dragged out into the public eye, as this has been dragged out into the public eye, would your relationship survive? Would your professional life survive? No.</p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s talking about &#8220;what Weiner did.&#8221; You know what? Something was <em><strong>done to Weiner.</strong></em></p>
<p>I realize I&#8217;m shouting now&#8230; I just get upset when I see everyone pretend to not know what they <em>do</em> know about human sexuality and the way it works. And this sort of willful obtuseness on the part of the media, that plays into American sex-phobia and hypocrisy about sex. And this <em>posturing.</em></p>
<p>Everyone is talking now about Weiner like, &#8220;He&#8217;s a congressman, and he had to know that this could happen &mdash; that these pictures could surface and be made public &mdash; and that was reckless, and displayed a kind of bad judgment that we can&#8217;t have in congress.&#8221; We wouldn&#8217;t want bad judgment in congress, not now, not after 200+ years of a bad-judgment-free congress. </p>
<p>Congress 20 years from now, 30 years from now, is going to be solely comprised of people who have taken pictures of their junk and put them online. <em>Every teenager in America</em> is online, is flirting, dating, putting up internet profiles, looking for love&#8230; is sending pictures of their junk! Sexting!</p>
<p>Soon, we will have a congress that is entirely Anthony Weiners. What are we going to do then? Are we really saying that the only people who are fit to serve in the U.S. Congress are the people who have <em>never</em> gone online and done anything inappropriate? Because what we&#8217;re really asking for, then, is to be ruled by the Amish.</p></blockquote>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/injustice/" title="(in)justice" rel="tag">(in)justice</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/blogroll/" title="blogroll" rel="tag">blogroll</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/congress/" title="congress" rel="tag">congress</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/hypocrisy/" title="hypocrisy" rel="tag">hypocrisy</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/news-media/" title="news media" rel="tag">news media</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/rants/" title="rants" rel="tag">rants</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/" title="sex" rel="tag">sex</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2011/06/16/weiner-doesnt-have-a-problem-he-has-a-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Videos of 2010: 7. Funny or Die, &#8220;The Committee Ep 1: Bad Dog&#8221; [NSFW]</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/31/top-ten-videos-of-2010-7-funny-or-die-the-committee-ep-1-bad-dog-nsfw/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/31/top-ten-videos-of-2010-7-funny-or-die-the-committee-ep-1-bad-dog-nsfw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny or Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSFW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=3843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big countdown continues! Like its immediate predecessor, my number seven video of 2010 comes from the wacky web-video wellspring Funny or Die. Like both number eight and number nine on this list, it directly involves a friend of mine &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/31/top-ten-videos-of-2010-7-funny-or-die-the-committee-ep-1-bad-dog-nsfw/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><span title="T" class="cap"><span>T</span></span>he big countdown continues! Like its <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/30/top-ten-videos-of-2010-8-funny-or-die-between-two-ferns-with-zach-galifianakis-bruce-willis-nsfw/">immediate predecessor</a>, my number seven video of 2010 comes from the wacky web-video wellspring <a href="http://funnyordie.com">Funny or Die</a>. Like both number eight and number nine on this list, it directly involves a friend of mine &mdash; <strong>but</strong>, be it known that it is the last video in the 2010 list that does so. The point of the list is to share videos that I really enjoyed, not to plug for my friends or try to seem cool by association.<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/31/top-ten-videos-of-2010-7-funny-or-die-the-committee-ep-1-bad-dog-nsfw/#fn-3843-1' id='fnref-3843-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3843)'>1</a></sup></p>
<p>Another important detail about this video: if my #7 video is <abbr title="Not safe for work">NSFW</abbr> (and it is), this one is <strong><em>very</em></strong> NSFW. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
<p>So here it is, featuring <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1360860/">Rich Sommer</a> (<em>Mad Men</em>), <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1555340/">Alison Brie</a><em> (Mad Men</em>, <em>Community</em>), and my friend <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0429760/">Kathryn Joosten</a> (<em>The West Wing</em>, <em>Wedding Crashers</em>, <em>Desperate Housewives</em>, etc).</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.funnyordie.com/embed/814484ebd6" width="640" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you one thing: I&#8217;ve heard Kathy say far dirtier stuff.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/actors/" title="actors" rel="tag">actors</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/comedy/" title="comedy" rel="tag">comedy</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/friends/" title="friends" rel="tag">friends</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/funny-or-die/" title="Funny or Die" rel="tag">Funny or Die</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/lists/" title="lists" rel="tag">lists</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/nsfw/" title="NSFW" rel="tag">NSFW</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/profanity/" title="profanity" rel="tag">profanity</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/" title="sex" rel="tag">sex</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/tv/" title="TV" rel="tag">TV</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/31/top-ten-videos-of-2010-7-funny-or-die-the-committee-ep-1-bad-dog-nsfw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Videos of 2010: 9. 2 Hot Girls in the Shower, &#8220;Revealed&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/29/top-ten-videos-of-2010-9-2-hot-girls-in-the-shower-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/29/top-ten-videos-of-2010-9-2-hot-girls-in-the-shower-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=3806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next video on my big year-end countdown is the handiwork of my friend Julie Wittner and her frequent co-conspirator Kim Evey. Earlier this year C&#038;B featured a parody music video they made a few years ago as a one-off &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/29/top-ten-videos-of-2010-9-2-hot-girls-in-the-shower-revealed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><span title="T" class="cap"><span>T</span></span>he next video on my big year-end countdown is the handiwork of my friend Julie Wittner and her frequent co-conspirator Kim Evey. Earlier this year C&#038;B featured <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/05/03/what-would-jesus-anything/">a parody music video</a> they made a few years ago as a one-off piece; the clip below is one from their continuing series of video vignettes suggestively (but as you&#8217;ll see, coyly) titled <em>2 Hot Girls in the Shower</em>, which has become part of the &#8220;Judge Me By My Friends&#8217; Blogs&#8221; section of the C&#038;B home page blogroll. </p>
<p><iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X99oWl87fd4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Part of what I love about this series may be best appreciated by others who run their own websites or YouTube channels. The title <em>2 Hot Girls in the Shower</em> and its comic realization are a sly swipe at the skeevy side of <abbr title="search engine optimization">SEO</abbr>, a phenomenon often referred to as &#8220;keyword whoring.&#8221; In addition to <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=keyword+whore">its definition on urbandictionary.com</a>, keyword whoring can take the form of lame web content that has been stuffed full of frequently-occurring Google search terms (contextual logic be damned) in an effort to attract web traffic.</p>
<p>Not only does <em>2HGITS</em> sound like it should be the name of a p&oslash;&reg;n site, but each clip begins with stereotypical semi-funk p&oslash;&reg;n-ish music and the appearance of two good-looking, ostensibly naked women standing in a shower. It is all, of course, just the launching pad for a deft comic duo who excel at poking sophisticated fun at the &#8220;Loveline&#8221;/Penthouse Forum conceit. They strike a precise comic note with their droll, underplayed thwarting of horny male websurfers, a target so easy as to usually attract only self-satisfied derision from lesser wits. The elegant simplicity of their schtick is also the perfect rejoinder to the predictably cretinous inanities of their YouTube commenters and emailers.</p>
<p>The <em>2 Hot Girls in the Shower</em> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/LKGProductions">YouTube channel</a> includes all of the 40+ episodes Julie and Kim have made so far. There are also a lot of funny outtake clips and other extras posted &mdash; for example, you might like to start with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKJjJxkcNOM">three</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA7LC_pnhyI">alternate</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQituup6y48">endings</a> to the &#8220;Revealed&#8221; video. Julie and Kim also both have their very own neato-cool individual sites, respectively located at <a href="http://www.juliewittner.com/">www.juliewittner.com</a> and <a href="http://www.kimevey.com/">www.kimevey.com</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/actors/" title="actors" rel="tag">actors</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/comedy/" title="comedy" rel="tag">comedy</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/friends/" title="friends" rel="tag">friends</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/lists/" title="lists" rel="tag">lists</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/satire/" title="satire" rel="tag">satire</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/seo/" title="SEO" rel="tag">SEO</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/" title="sex" rel="tag">sex</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/12/29/top-ten-videos-of-2010-9-2-hot-girls-in-the-shower-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got You Covered: &#8220;Nobody Does It Better&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Got You Covered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=3584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, the James Bond theme song: a sub-genre unto itself. There are songs, and there are movie songs, and then there are movie theme songs&#8230; and only then is there the Bond film song: a sub-sub-sub-genre distinctive for being (like &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-single-front-cover.jpg"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-single-front-cover-125x125.jpg" alt="single" title="The original 45 RPM single. Dig that disco lettering!" width="125" height="125" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-3614 colorbox-3584" /></a><span title="A" class="cap"><span>A</span></span>h, the James Bond theme song: a sub-genre unto itself. There are songs, and there are movie songs, and then there are movie theme songs&#8230; and only then is there the Bond film song: a sub-sub-sub-genre distinctive for being (like the Bond movies themselves) unabashedly over-the-top. The best Bond songs are broad-stroke, go-for-broke, balls-out records: Shirley Bassey&#8217;s clarion &#8220;Goldfinger,&#8221; Paul McCartney &#038; Wings&#8217;s churning &#8220;Live and Let Die,&#8221; and the subject of this post, &#8220;Nobody Does It Better.&#8221; Composed by Marvin Hamlisch and Carole Bayer Sager, it played under the opening titles of the 1977 Bond adventure <em>The Spy Who Loved Me</em>. Carly Simon&#8217;s warm, wide-open performance of the pop ballad caught the fancy of moviegoers<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/#fn-3584-1' id='fnref-3584-1' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3584)'>1</a></sup> and radio station directors alike, and the single reached #2 on the U.S. pop charts. Here&#8217;s the first minute or so, just for nostalgia&#8217;s sake:</p>
<p><audio controls="controls"<br />
<source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Carly-Simon.ogg" type="audio/ogg" /><br />
<source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Carly-Simon.mp3" type="audio/mpeg" /><br />
Your browser does not support the audio element. Bummer.</audio></p>
<p>Like just about all of the songs in my <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/taxonomy/tags/series/got-you-covered/">Got You Covered</a> series, &#8220;Nobody Does It Better&#8221; has been covered more times than a 90-year-old exhibitionist. Before I highlight my favorite version, I would be remiss if I didn&#8217;t address the rendition by <a href="http://www.radiohead.com/deadairspace/">Radiohead</a>. A taste:<span id="more-3584"></span></p>
<p><audio controls="controls"><br />
  <source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Radiohead.ogg" type="audio/ogg" /><br />
  <source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Radiohead.mp3" type="audio/mpeg" /><br />
Your browser does not support the audio element. Bummer.</audio></p>
<div class="imageleft"><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Thom_Yorke.jpg"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Thom_Yorke-125x125.jpg" alt="yorke" title="Thom Yorke of Radiohead" width="125" height="125" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3612 colorbox-3584" /></a>
<p>Thom Yorke of Radiohead<br/><span style="letter-spacing:-0.5px;">(photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/87253219@N00/214913218">Flickr/Tim Cochrane</a>)</span></p>
</div>
<p>Let me preface this by affirming that Radiohead is a very popular, respected, and influential band, and deservedly so. I like them. Their rendition of this song just doesn&#8217;t work for me. I like the arrangement fine, particularly the heavy, distorted guitar in the broad sections. The problem I have is frontman Thom Yorke&#8217;s vocal: simply put, he&#8217;s working too hard. The vocal line sits at the upper reaches of his range, and I can&#8217;t help but wonder what might be possible if Radiohead had taken it down about a whole step. As it stands, the foregoing clip shows a few of the instances where Yorke gets a bit, shall we say, approximate with regard to pitch. I&#8217;m aware that this quavering, sliding-between-notes quality is sometimes part of his style as a singer, but in this instance it undercuts the intention of the song. On one live recording Yorke intros the song by calling it &#8220;the sexiest song that was ever written,&#8221; and he&#8217;d get little argument from me &mdash; but that&#8217;s precisely why the song should be sung with <em>ease</em>. Or at least without hints of anguish.</p>
<p>The possible hues of ease range well beyond just the warm, soft-focus palette of Carly Simon&#8217;s original single. The rendition I stumbled across is from an album called <em><a href="http://amzn.to/b431Cg">Shaken &#038; Stirred: The David Arnold James Bond Project</a></em> and is performed by indie singer-songwriter Aimee Mann.<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/#fn-3584-2' id='fnref-3584-2' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3584)'>2</a></sup> Get a load of this (OK, not a <em>load</em>, but a clip):</p>
<p><audio controls="controls"><br />
  <source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Aimee-Mann-clip.ogg" type="audio/ogg" /><br />
  <source src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Aimee-Mann-clip.mp3" type="audio/mpeg" /><br />
Your browser does not support the audio element. Bummer.</audio> </p>
<div class="imageright"><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/aimeemann.jpg"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/aimeemann-225x300.jpg" alt="aimee_mann" title="Aimee Mann" width="225" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3613 colorbox-3584" /></a>
<p>Aimee Mann<br />(photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/andy-roo/2991960168/">Flickr/6tee-zeven</a>)</p>
</div>
<p>Like the Carly Simon version&#8217;s voice-and-piano opening, Mann&#8217;s cover starts off small: a monaural accordion overlaid by the soft dust-pops of a phonograph needle. The big, reverberating chords that enter with the top of the first verse set things rolling toward the grand second chorus, by which time I&#8217;m well and truly hooked. This recording of the song finds an element of fantasy not explored by other versions: a girl alone in her room, listening to a phonograph record, imagining herself with James Bond. There is a poignancy to Mann&#8217;s airy, almost uninflected delivery of the first lines, and when she opens up her tone in the later sections she does so without &#8220;cutting the string,&#8221; as one of my old vocal coaches used to say.<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/#fn-3584-3' id='fnref-3584-3' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3584)'>3</a></sup></p>
<p>Normally I end these posts with links to places where you can buy mp3 downloads of the song in question. Unfortunately, despite my considerable googling skills I have been unable to find a site where you can <em>legally</em> download either the Aimee Mann or the Radiohead version of &#8220;Nobody Does It Better.&#8221;<sup class='footnote'><a href='http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/#fn-3584-4' id='fnref-3584-4' onclick='return fdfootnote_show(3584)'>4</a></sup> The David Arnold album containing the Aimee Mann cover is <a href="http://amzn.to/b431Cg">on Amazon, but only on CD</a>. The Radiohead version is even more elusive; <a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Radiohead/_/Nobody+Does+It+Better">according to Last.fm</a> it is included on recordings called <em>B-Sides</em>, <em>Rarities</em>, <em>Uncut</em>, <em>A Total Waste of Time</em>, and <em>Painkiller</em>, all of which appear to be bootlegs. Allmusic.com lists it on another bootleg recording, <em><a href="http://www.allmusic.com/album/ground-control-to-major-thom-r855100">Ground Control to Major Thom</a>.</em> Lastly, there are currently several <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=radiohead+nobody+does+it+better&#038;aq=0">videos on YouTube</a> of Radiohead playing the song. </p>
<p>If you want to get the original Carly Simon version, that&#8217;s a much simpler matter: the mp3 is <a href="http://amzn.to/aKiIUh">available on Amazon</a> for 99 cents.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/audio-clips/" title="audio clips" rel="tag">audio clips</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/cover-songs/" title="cover songs" rel="tag">cover songs</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/downloads/" title="downloads" rel="tag">downloads</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/lastfm/" title="last.fm" rel="tag">last.fm</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/mp3/" title="mp3" rel="tag">mp3</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/music/" title="music" rel="tag">music</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/sex/" title="sex" rel="tag">sex</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/10/19/got-you-covered-nobody-does-it-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Carly-Simon.mp3" length="1054604" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Radiohead.mp3" length="963947" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Aimee-Mann-clip.mp3" length="1265748" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Carly-Simon.ogg" length="1128873" type="audio/ogg" />
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Radiohead.ogg" length="1096171" type="audio/ogg" />
<enclosure url="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Nobody-Does-It-Better-Aimee-Mann-clip.ogg" length="1537544" type="audio/ogg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

