<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cheek and Bluster &#187; recommendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekandbluster.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old and Improved</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/11/15/old-and-improved/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/11/15/old-and-improved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Fosse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favorites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=3646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, while re-embedding the video on my post Favorite Movies: All That Jazz, I found myself obliged to revise and substantially expand the original text. To back up a step: yes, I did say &#8220;re-embedding the video.&#8221; As a &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/11/15/old-and-improved/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/11/15/old-and-improved/"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/allthatjazz_405x600-e1289849003778-125x125.jpg" alt="poster" title="allthatjazz_thumb" width="125" height="125" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-3643 colorbox-3646" /></a><span title="L" class="cap"><span>L</span></span>ast night, while re-embedding the video on my post <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2007/05/15/favorite-movies-all-that-jazz/">Favorite Movies: <em>All That Jazz</em></a>, I found myself obliged to revise and substantially expand the original text. To back up a step: yes, I did say &#8220;re-embedding the video.&#8221; As a consequence of my decision to shift the handling of photos and videos here on <acronym title="Cheek and Bluster">C&#038;B</acronym> from the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/floatbox-plus/">Floatbox Plus</a> plugin to the simpler <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/highslide-4-wordpress-reloaded/">Highslide 4 WordPress</a> plugin, I have to go back and re-embed all the videos in my old posts. I could go into detail about why this is necessary, but I&#8217;d like to keep my readers awake if possible. My point&mdash;and I do have one&mdash;is that since writing the original <em>All That Jazz</em> post I have notched at least one more viewing of the movie, not to mention three and a half more years of overall insight (for better or worse). So you see, my hand was forced. Go <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2007/05/15/favorite-movies-all-that-jazz/">check it out</a>&mdash;even if you don&#8217;t care what I wrote and you just want to <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2007/05/15/favorite-movies-all-that-jazz/">see the awesome video</a> of the song-and-dance number.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/bob-fosse/" title="Bob Fosse" rel="tag">Bob Fosse</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/favorites/" title="favorites" rel="tag">favorites</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/movies/" title="movies" rel="tag">movies</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/plugins/" title="plugins" rel="tag">plugins</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/" title="recommendations" rel="tag">recommendations</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/reviews/" title="reviews" rel="tag">reviews</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/update/" title="update" rel="tag">update</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/wordpress/" title="WordPress" rel="tag">WordPress</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/11/15/old-and-improved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hasty Reaction: Harlan County USA</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/05/01/harlan-county-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/05/01/harlan-county-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harlan County U.S.A. (1976) Directed by Barbara Kopple; watched on Criterion Collection DVD. An urgent, immersing documentary of an Appalachian coal mining community&#8217;s more than year-long strike against corporate overlord Duke Power. The camera gets itself everywhere you would hope &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/05/01/harlan-county-usa/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074605/"><strong>Harlan County U.S.A.</strong></a></em> (1976) <em>Directed by Barbara Kopple; watched on <a href="http://www.criterion.com/films/777-harlan-county-usa">Criterion Collection DVD</a></em>. An urgent, immersing documentary of an Appalachian coal mining community&#8217;s more than year-long strike against corporate overlord Duke Power. The camera gets itself everywhere you would hope it could &#8211; the families&#8217; homes, union meetings, planning sessions by the miners&#8217; wives (who show at least as much grit as the men, often more), on the picket lines when the strikebreaking gun thugs attack, a mile underground in the mines themselves, at Duke Power shareholder meetings, and more. Unforgettable characters emerge, underscored by the raw honesty of the area&#8217;s indigenous bluegrass songs vocalized by subjects of the film. Parallels to recent WV mine explosion &#038; 29 deaths are, unsurprisingly, present in several instances. A work of passionate storytelling, made at no small personal risk, richly deserving of its Best Documentary Academy Award, and absolutely among the great documentary films of the last 50 years. See it.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/big-business/" title="big business" rel="tag">big business</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/documentaries/" title="documentaries" rel="tag">documentaries</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/dvd/" title="DVD" rel="tag">DVD</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/movies/" title="movies" rel="tag">movies</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/oscars/" title="Oscars" rel="tag">Oscars</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/" title="recommendations" rel="tag">recommendations</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/05/01/harlan-county-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Movies of the Decade</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/15/top-10-movies-of-the-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/15/top-10-movies-of-the-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Greengrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=1824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Chen recently asked, &#8220;Since everybody else is making lists of their top ten films of the decade, does that mean I have to, too?&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t presume to speak for him, but my own answer to the same rhetorical &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/15/top-10-movies-of-the-decade/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><span title="J" class="cap"><span>J</span></span>eff Chen recently asked, &#8220;Since everybody else is making lists of their top ten films of the decade, does that mean I have to, too?&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t presume to speak for him, but my own answer to the same rhetorical question is a sheepish &#8220;yes.&#8221; Jeff ended up making <a href="http://windowtothemovies.com/review-decade00.html">his list</a>, too, although I don&#8217;t know how sheepish he felt about it.</p>
<p>Anyway, here are my top <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">ten</span>&#8230;nah, screw it—<strong>twelve</strong> favorite movies of the decade just completed, i.e., 2000-2009.</p>
<ol>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Dogville</em> (2004)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dogville.jpg"><img src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/dogville_thumb.jpg" alt="dogville_thumb" title="1. Dogville" width="101" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1864 colorbox-1824" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/J5-LqwUHTaM">Trailer</a><br /><a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Dogville/60034546?trkid=222336">Add to Netflix Queue</a><br /><a href="http://www.panix.com/~dangelo/cannes03.html#dogv.html">Mike D&#8217;Angelo, <em>The Man Who Viewed Too Much</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Inevitably, von Trier&#8217;s spartan aesthetic has American critics citing <em>Our Town</em>, but in both method and spirit <em>Dogville</em> has much more in common with Brecht&#8217;s <em>The Good Woman of Setzuan</em> (written in Denmark, ironically), another sorrowful disquisition on the mercenary aspects of human nature. Anything this ostentatiously artificial demands to be read as allegory, of course, and charges of anti-Americanism aren&#8217;t entirely groundless &#8212; certainly the film is very, very critical of the way that the U.S. treats its underclass, and to argue that Von Trier isn&#8217;t entitled to feel that disgust without having set foot in the continental 48 is patently absurd.
</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Capturing the Friedmans</em> (2003)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/capturing_the_friedmans.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1862 colorbox-1824" title="Capturing the Friedmans" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/capturing_the_friedmans_thumb.jpg" alt="capturing the friedmans" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/R10VjJgx1dU">Trailer</a><br /><a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Capturing_the_Friedmans/60027997?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br /><a href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/witness-to-the-persecution/Content?oid=912339">Jonathan Rosenbaum, <em>Chicago Reader</em></a>:<br />
<blockquote>If <em>Capturing the Friedmans</em> were less shapely and less of a masterpiece, I&#8217;d find it less troubling. Both times I&#8217;ve seen it I&#8217;ve felt that by the end practically everyone associated with the film seems tarnished in one way or another: the ostensible subjects (the Friedmans, an upper-middle-class Jewish family in the Long Island town of Great Neck), the members of their community who helped destroy much of their lives, the filmmakers, and the audience. We&#8217;re all tainted by the graphic exposure of family wounds, diminished by what we think and feel&#8211;and by what we don&#8217;t think and don&#8217;t feel.</p></blockquote></div>
</li>
<p><span id="more-1824"></span></p>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>The Lord of the Rings</em> trilogy (2001-2003)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Lord-of-the-Rings.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1866 colorbox-1824" title="Lord of the Rings" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Lord-of-the-Rings_thumb.jpg" alt="LOTR" width="101" height="150" /></a><br />Trailers:&emsp;<a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/VIgkpEgCV-I"><em>Fellowship</em></a>&emsp;<a class="colorbox-link"  href="http://www.youtube.com/v/cG-1Gtus7KQ"><em>Towers</em></a>&emsp;<a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/atKEVOpFL5Q"><em>Return</em></a><br />
Netflix:&emsp;<em><a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_The_Fellowship_of_the_Ring_Extended_Edition/70024198?trkid=222336">Fellowship</a>&emsp;<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_The_Two_Towers_Extended_Edition/70024206?trkid=222336">Towers</a>&emsp;<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Lord_of_the_Rings_The_Return_of_the_King_Extended_Edition/70024202?trkid=222336">Return</a></em><br />
<a href="http://windowtothemovies.com/LV-lotr-rotk.html">Jeffrey Chen, <em>LVJeffrey&#8217;s Window to the Movies</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thinking about this trilogy, I ponder over the strange dynamics of its journey to the screen. Peter Jackson and his team of wizards had already set themselves up with the first two movies &#8212; they were instantly beloved, receiving more praise from critics and public alike than most movies could ever dream of having. Naturally, the demand would be for the third episode to match the same heights. Even if Jackson only needed to deliver a movie that simply met expectations, he&#8217;d already have to create something quite special. Thus, the successful effectiveness of the final film should be an astonishing feat &#8212; we anticipate nothing less. It&#8217;s like putting Jackson on a golf course and telling him 18 hole-in-ones is par for the course.</p>
<p>But he did it.</p></blockquote></div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Before Sunset</em> (2004)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/before-sunset.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1860 colorbox-1824" title="Before Sunset" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/before-sunset_thumb.jpg" alt="before sunset" width="101" height="150" /></a><br />
<a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/XvFosXeqmDg">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Before_Sunset/60036229?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Before-Sunset/dp/B001N9ESQ4/ref=ed_oe_vdr">Amazon.com Video on Demand</a><br />
<a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/before-sunset,5029/">Scott Tobias, <em>The A.V. Club</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When Hawke first beckoned Delpy off the train in [this film's 1995 prequel] <em>Before Sunrise</em>, he lured her with a half-sincere, half-smoke-and-mirrors speech about how she should take a chance or else feel some doubt in her romantic future. Though it seemed like a harmless come-on at the time, those words carry an achingly ironic resonance in <em>Before Sunset</em>, when the renewed pleasure they take in each other&#8217;s company only deepens their regret about where life has steered them. Shooting in long takes, [director Richard] Linklater and his actors (who get co-screenwriting credit) allow the conversation to curlicue effortlessly from literate banter to matters of the heart, and sometimes to places in between. And, in the spirit of the original, Linklater closes with one of the best endings of its kind since George Romero&#8217;s <em>Martin</em>.</p></blockquote></div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others)</em> (2006)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/lives-of-others.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1884 colorbox-1824" title="The Lives of Others" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/lives-of-others_thumb.jpg" alt="lives of others" width="100" height="150" /></a><br />
<a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/n3_iLOp6IhM">Trailer</a><br /><a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Lives_of_Others/70056425?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/reviews/cl-et-lives1dec01,0,2952621.story">Kenneth Turan, <em>Los Angeles Times</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Writer/director Florian Henckel] von Donnersmarck has set his film in the East Germany of 1984, five years before the Berlin Wall collapsed. It was a time when the terrifying Stasi, the secret police, made it their business to use an extensive network of spies and surveillance to know every secret thing about their citizens.  Unlike other German films, most notably 2004&#8242;s landmark <em>Goodbye, Lenin</em>, <em>Lives</em> is hardly an exercise in what&#8217;s called &#8220;Ostalgia&#8221;&#8211;nostalgia for the good old days of the East. Instead it is an inside look at how a surveillance society, set up to discover and prey upon human weakness, has the ability to make everyone a potential suspect and destroy everything it touches.  <em>The Lives of Others</em> does all this beautifully, but it is too well-acted a film, too meticulously plotted and carefully directed, to be satisfied with that alone. It&#8217;s also finally too smart to be content with telling anything like a familiar story.</p></blockquote></div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Y Tu Mamá También (And Your Mama Too)</strong></em> (2002)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/y-tu-mama-tambien.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1859 colorbox-1824" title="Y Tu Mamá También" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/y-tu-mama-tambien_thumb.jpg" alt="y tu mama" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/gSA7F46w7oc">Trailer</a><br /><a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Y_tu_mama_tambien/60023237?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br /><a href="http://nymag.com/nymetro/movies/reviews/5775/">Peter Rainer, <em>New York Magazine</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve all seen (or consciously avoided seeing) plenty of Hollywood comedies about horny teens, but the two Mexican 17-year-olds in this film, Tenoch (Diego Luna) and Julio (Gael García Bernal), are perhaps the freest and most closely observed of their species to ever grace the screen. <em>Y Tu Mamá También</em> is like a Bill-and-Ted movie made by a true artist, and this in itself is a great joke.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Mulholland Dr.</em> (2001)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mullholland-dr.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2023 colorbox-1824" title="Mulholland Dr" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mullholland-dr_thumb.jpg" alt="Mullholland Dr" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fuok9l2mX1g">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Mulholland_Dr./60021646?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mulholland-Drive/dp/B000IEXVCC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=digital-video&amp;qid=1263528906&amp;sr=1-1">Amazon VoD</a><br />
<a href="http://www.deep-focus.com/dfweblog/2001/10/mulholland_dr_2001.html">Bryant Frazer, <em>Deep Focus</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Mulholland Dr.</em> could be described as a movie about a dream about Hollywood. The audio design, credited to [writer/director David] Lynch, throbs with amplified ambient sound that suggests not just the ever-present noise of the city, but also, by literally surrounding the viewer, the expansive and unexplored spaces inside one&#8217;s own head. The helicopter shots peering straight down between skyscrapers as the booming sound of the city fills the movie theater are incredibly eerie, capturing the uneasy feeling of being alone, downtown, in the middle of the night.</p>
<p>In collaboration with cinematographer Michael Deming, Lynch bathes his images in unease. His camera can best be described as floating, often moving vertically within a scene and looking down upon the characters, or sucking us forward into a point-of-view that we&#8217;re not sure we want to share.</p></blockquote></div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Traffic</em> (2000)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/traffic.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1867 colorbox-1824" title="Traffic" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/traffic_thumb.jpg" alt="traffic" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/ky2CLy5a68w">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Traffic/60003243?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Traffic/dp/B0027WGWQ0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=digital-video&amp;qid=1263529272&amp;sr=1-1">Amazon VoD</a><br />
<a href="http://www.aboutfilm.com/movies/t/traffic.htm">Jeff Vorndam, <em>AboutFilm.com</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What <em>Traffic</em> achieves, and what makes it a great, landmark film is that it acknowledges our culpability and how at odds we are with the avowed intent to eradicate drugs. Our society creates this problem with its insatiable demand for drugs, be they heroin, alcohol, tobacco, or diet pills. We love the stuff, and refusing to look ourselves in the eye short-circuits any plans to attack the side effects. One should ask, after viewing the film, if the side effects should be attacked at all, or if efforts are better spent treating the necessary ills that accompany our thirsts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m speaking in this broad sense because that&#8217;s where the film is strongest. I&#8217;ve read the complaints about the story timeline and the portrayals of certain characters, and they are not without merit, but in the end they make little difference to me because the totality of the film is so utterly moving. Some have said it&#8217;s not telling us anything we didn&#8217;t already know about the War on Drugs. Well, <em>The Insider</em> didn&#8217;t tell us anything we didn&#8217;t already know about smoking&#8211;which is to say, it&#8217;s beside the point.</p>
<p><em>Traffic</em> isn&#8217;t a message movie, it&#8217;s a movie about a state of being. It&#8217;s about being hopelessly incapable of affecting real change. It&#8217;s a state of besiegement, frustration, and resignation. Finally, it is a state of dogged optimism.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Bloody Sunday</em> (2002)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Bloody_Sunday.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1861 colorbox-1824" title="Bloody Sunday" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Bloody_Sunday_thumb.jpg" alt="bloody sunday" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/6sssXPYcXZc">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Bloody_Sunday/60024970?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickfilosopher.com/blog/2002/11/bloody_sunday_review.html">MaryAnn Johanson, <em>The Flick Filosopher</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>On a gray January Sunday in 1972, in Derry, Northern Ireland, British soldiers opened fire with live ammunition on unarmed, peaceful demonstrators, killing 13. Shocking and visceral, writer/director Paul Greengrass&#8217;s documentary-style re-creation of the horrifying events of that day pulls no punches, bluntly depicting the powder-keg atmosphere of the city: the disquieting enthusiasm of the British troops on the streets, tired of taking the brunt of local ire and itching for a fight; the disdain of the British major general on the scene (Tim Pigott-Smith, weaselly perfection), dismissing civil-rights protestors as &#8220;hooligans&#8221;; the zeal of the people of Derry, led by the local MP (James Nesbitt, energetic and passionate), unwilling to back down in their own city.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon</strong></em> (2000)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Crouching-Tiger-Hidden-Dragon.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1863 colorbox-1824" title="Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Crouching-Tiger-Hidden-Dragon_thumb.jpg" alt="CTHD" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/KvjUj3OwfZE">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Crouching_Tiger_Hidden_Dragon/60002907?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Crouching-Tiger-Hidden-Dragon/dp/B002PNKWV2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=digital-video&amp;qid=1263531754&amp;sr=1-1">Amazon VoD</a><br />
<a href="http://classic.outlawvern.com/VTILIIarchive12.html#anchor58347">Vern, <em>Then Fuck You, Jack: The Life and Art of Vern</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>To me the highly acclaimed picture <em>Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon</em> is not so much about fighting as it is about love and woman empowerment and graceful movement. It&#8217;s more like a musical or one a them tapdancing movies they made back then with all the singing and umbrellas and what not. And I ain&#8217;t making excuses like the other critics, because I&#8217;d RATHER say it was a kung fu movie, and I loved it. But facts are facts, and this is a tap dancing movie. I ain&#8217;t complainin though cause it&#8217;s the best tap dancing movies I seen in years.</p>
<p>My man [Chow Yun] Fat gets to perform stunts like I never seen him before, because he&#8217;s doing all kinds of kung fu and great swordsmanshipping. In case you don&#8217;t know not all chinese dudes know kung fu, and I never seen Fat do it before. Always using guns. Maybe a punch now and then but very rarely kicking. Here he&#8217;s flyin around like a god damn superman, flippin the swords around like WHISH WHISH WHISH and who the fuck even KNOWS what some a those weapons are called that he&#8217;s using. These guys know how to USE the things, we americans can&#8217;t even NAME them. That&#8217;s how far ahead of us Fat is.</p>
<p>But like I said, this is a tapdancing movie. Not a Badass movie. And Fat is one fuck of a tapdancer.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>Almost Famous</em> (2000)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Almost-Famous.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1878 colorbox-1824" title="Almost Famous" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Almost-Famous_thumb.jpg" alt="almost famous" width="101" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/qk0XnyrENrE">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Almost_Famous/60002325?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/13/arts/13FAMO.html?pagewanted=all">Dana Stevens, <em>New York Times</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In <em>Almost Famous</em>, a loose, affectionate look back on his earlier career as a teenage music journalist, [Cameron] Crowe has devoted a whole movie to the love of rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll. The soul he lays open — a sweet, forgiving and generous one — is his own. The movie follows the adventures of William Miller (Patrick Fugit), a San Diego 15-year-old whose fairy-tale ascendance from nerdy schoolboy to <em>Rolling Stone</em> reporter mirrors Mr. Crowe&#8217;s own life story. But Mr. Crowe is less interested in biographical or historical literalism — he freely mixes real and fictional characters and prefers period atmosphere to period detail — than in evoking the joyful, reckless, earnest energy of rock in the years between 60&#8242;s idealism and punk nihilism.</p>
<p>He may be the least cynical director working in Hollywood today. In his hands this coming-of-age story is as much about the preservation of William&#8217;s innocence as its loss; the music William loves protects him even as his involvement with it introduces him to all manner of worldly corruption.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="min-height: 160px;">
<h4><em>You Can Count on Me</em> (2000)</h4>
<p><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/you-can-count-on-me.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1868 colorbox-1824" title="You Can Count on Me" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/you-can-count-on-me_thumb.jpg" alt="you can count on me" width="100" height="150" /></a><a class="colorbox-link" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/n7XQP4DYY9c">Trailer</a><br />
<a href="http://www.netflix.com/Movie/You_Can_Count_on_Me/60003970?trkid=222336">Netflix</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nicksflickpicks.com/ycncount.html">Nick Davis, <em>Nick&#8217;s Flick Picks</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Have I failed at all to make <em>You Can Count on Me</em> sound like the warm, hilarious, moving story it is? It is the sort of film which I so poignantly hope people will see that I wish there were a sure-fire way to motivate you. I could go on about the wonders worked by [Laura] Linney, [Mark] Ruffalo, and even the young [Rory] Culkin, who is easily the least precious and therefore most winning of his brood. They disappear so completely into their gorgeously written parts that no one seems to be acting, just being. The cast is so confident with their roles that Lonergan, a playwright and screenwriter (<em>Analyze This</em>) making a very assured debut as a director, takes them everywhere with equally persuasive results: broad comedy, light romance, fisticuffs, apologies.</p></blockquote>
</div>
</li>
</ol>
<hr />
<h3>A Few Stats About the Top 12</h3>
<ul>
<li>Movies released 2005-2009:  1</li>
<li>Single year with most films on the list:  2000 (4)</li>
<li>Movies in a language other than English:  3</li>
<li>English-language movies by non-US filmmakers:  3</li>
<li>Movies I currently own on DVD:  6</li>
<li>Of those, sweetest and most tricked-out DVD:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lord-Rings-Picture-Platinum-Extended/dp/B000654ZK0/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1262844152&amp;sr=1-6"><em>The Lord of the Rings</em> Platinum Series (Special Extended Edition)</a></li>
<li>Cheeriest:  <em>Almost Famous</em></li>
<li>Least cheery:  <em>Dogville</em></li>
<li>Most likely to have been seen:  <em>The Lord of the Rings</em></li>
<li>Least likely to have been seen:  Probably <em>Dogville</em>, and will probably remain so (see above, &#8220;least cheery&#8221;)</li>
<li>Baddest muthafucka: Yu Shu Lien (Michelle Yeoh) in <em>Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon</em></li>
<li>Longest <acronym title="industry parlance meaning the lead actors, writer(s), and director of a film">above-the-line</acronym> name:  Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, writer/director of <em>The Lives of Others</em></li>
<li>How arbitrary the numerical rankings feel to me upon reflection:  very</li>
<li>Reportedly awesome 2000-2009 movies I haven&#8217;t seen: dozens</li>
<li>Close, but no cigar: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0338013/">Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1084950/">Rachel Getting Married</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0399146/">A History of Violence</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0212720/">A.I. Artificial Intelligence</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307901/">25th Hour</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0477348/">No Country for Old Men</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/">Memento</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0887912/">The Hurt Locker</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0404203/">Little Children</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405422/">The 40 Year Old Virgin</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0299458/">All the Real Girls</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0443680/">The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0498380/">Letters from Iwo Jima</a></em>, <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0388795/">Brokeback Mountain</a></em></li>
</ul>
<p>So, how wrong am I? How suspect is my taste? Lay it on me in the <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/15/top-10-movies-of-the-decade/#respond">comments</a>.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/actors/" title="actors" rel="tag">actors</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/critics/" title="critics" rel="tag">critics</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/dancers/" title="dancers" rel="tag">dancers</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/david-lynch/" title="David Lynch" rel="tag">David Lynch</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/dvd/" title="DVD" rel="tag">DVD</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/friends/" title="friends" rel="tag">friends</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/hollywood/" title="Hollywood" rel="tag">Hollywood</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/lists/" title="lists" rel="tag">lists</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/mexico/" title="Mexico" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/movies/" title="movies" rel="tag">movies</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/musicals/" title="musicals" rel="tag">musicals</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/names/" title="names" rel="tag">names</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/paul-greengrass/" title="Paul Greengrass" rel="tag">Paul Greengrass</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/" title="recommendations" rel="tag">recommendations</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/15/top-10-movies-of-the-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Heavy is Beyond Funky–They’re Filthy</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/08/the-heavy-is-beyond-funky-theyre-filthy/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/08/the-heavy-is-beyond-funky-theyre-filthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=1928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So there I was, browsing through the various free downloads available at NPR Music (recession-friendly shopping, as I think of it). I had found some stuff I liked pretty well—at the very least, well enough to download it for free. &#8230; <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/08/the-heavy-is-beyond-funky-theyre-filthy/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><span title="S" class="cap"><span>S</span></span>o there I was, browsing through the various free downloads available at NPR Music (recession-friendly shopping, as I think of it). I had found some stuff I liked pretty well—at the very least, well enough to download it for free. Then I stumbled across something that I found truly exciting, and I reacted the way any music lover would: I thought, &#8220;I must blog this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unlike the other artists whose music I&#8217;d just downloaded (stuff by <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111328120">The Decemberists</a>, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101430586">K&#8217;Naan</a> and <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101426421">Heartless Bastards</a>, among others), I&#8217;d never heard of the British band The Heavy. Well, now I have&#8230; and you have too. Watch this:<br />
<span id="more-1928"></span></p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="480" height="300" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fEJypkRk9IA?rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>That video is from a four-song in-studio performance at <a href="http://kexp.org/">KEXP-90.3 in Seattle</a>. More details and an MP3 download of the session are available <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120707199">here</a>, and a YouTube playlist including the other three songs is <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120707199">here</a>. The Heavy&#8217;s two albums so far are <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Heavy/e/B001LI3FXE/ref=sr_tc_2_0">available on CD or MP3 download at Amazon</a>.</p>
<p><em>UPDATE:</em> <a href="http://www.theheavy.co.uk/">The Heavy&#8217;s home page</a> lists the band&#8217;s upcoming shows, which happen to include two in New York and one in Philly in the coming week. Damn&#8230; I&#8217;m having one of those &#8220;wrong coast&#8221; moments.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/downloads/" title="downloads" rel="tag">downloads</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/mp3/" title="mp3" rel="tag">mp3</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/music/" title="music" rel="tag">music</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/npr/" title="NPR" rel="tag">NPR</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/" title="recommendations" rel="tag">recommendations</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/08/the-heavy-is-beyond-funky-theyre-filthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Psyched – The Doctor Is In</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/03/10/get-psyched-the-doctor-is-in/</link>
		<comments>http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/03/10/get-psyched-the-doctor-is-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Byrne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second season of HBO's brilliant drama series <em>In Treatment</em> is finally almost here. I haven't been this geeked for the next episode of a TV show since <em>The Shield</em> ended. <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/03/10/get-psyched-the-doctor-is-in/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="first-p "><a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/intreatment_season2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-606 colorbox-605" title="In Treatment - Season 2" src="http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/intreatment_season2-199x300.jpg" alt="In Treatment - Season 2" width="199" height="300" /></a><span title="T" class="cap"><span>T</span></span>he second season of HBO&#8217;s brilliant drama series <em>In Treatment</em> is finally almost here. I haven&#8217;t been this geeked for the next episode of a TV show since <em>The Shield</em> ended.</p>
<p>If you didn&#8217;t act upon <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2008/02/02/you-must-see/">my entreaty</a> to watch <em>In Treatment</em> during its first season, don&#8217;t beat yourself up, because I couldn&#8217;t walk the walk myself. I was going without any TV service at the time, and after the first 15 or so episodes HBO stopped streaming them for free on its website. Now, fortunately, there are remedies for dramatic completists like me who need to catch up:</p>
<ol>
<li>If you have HBO, you have until March 15 to check out any of <a href="http://www.hbo.com/apps/hodschedule/hod/details.do?FID=PMRS180093">the first 20 episodes via HBO on Demand</a>. Presumably, after that they&#8217;ll have episodes 21-43 available the same way.</li>
<li>HBO&#8217;s bogarting of the <em>In Treatment</em> Season One DVD set <a href="http://dvdpricesearch.com/cgi-bin/goto?st=amazon&amp;ty=title&amp;id=B0013FSL0C">ends March 24</a>. So great is my esteem for the show, I may just pre-order it.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you&#8217;re not familiar with the show, here&#8217;s my attempt at a brief run-down.  Psychotherapist Paul Weston (Gabriel Byrne, pictured above) conducts weekly sessions with four different clients, and each session is depicted as one half-hour episode of the series. Paul&#8217;s Fridays are dramatized as his weekly visitations of his mentor Gina (Dianne Weist), who apprehensively counsels him on his own abundant issues despite questionable ethics of doing so.</p>
<p>In a broader sense, <em>In Treatment</em> is all about ethical dilemmas. <span id="more-605"></span>Paul&#8217;s foundation of therapeutic skill and experience are evident enough; the drama takes off as that foundation&#8217;s flaws and fissures exploited by a set of difficult and often deceitful set of clients. Take for example Paul&#8217;s failing marriage to the young and attractive Kate (Michelle Forbes, seen in brief intervals before and after his sessions), and his possibly-failing resolve to ward off the overtures of his young and attractive client Laura (Melissa George):</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7M3XrZVtt4I?rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>Similar &#8220;portrait&#8221; clips of Paul&#8217;s other Season One clients are likewise posted on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/HBO">HBO&#8217;s YouTube Channel</a>, along with two-minute recaps of many episodes.  <strong>However, I must stress</strong> that the clips cannot substitute for seeing the full episodes. What really sets <em>In Treatment</em> apart from other series is that each episode feels whole and continuous, like watching an unbroken scene in a play live and in person. The episodes take place (with only minor exceptions) in a single setting, and are filmed in extended takes often several minutes long. What ends up on the screen is beautifully simple: superb writing and superb acting, seamlessly directed and edited.</p>
<p>As if the news of the show&#8217;s return wasn&#8217;t welcome enough, my anticipation was compounded when I watched <a href="http://www.hbo.com/events/intreatment/index.html">the Season Two preview clip on the HBO site</a>. In addition to Byrne and Weist (both of whom are on my short list of favorite actors), Paul&#8217;s new crop of weekly conversationalists include characters played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm145594624/nm0204706">Hope Davis</a> (a mini-crush of mine ever since <em>Next Stop Wonderland</em>), Alison Pill (familiar from <a href="http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2718929920/tt1013753"><em>Milk</em></a>) and John Mahoney (who showed much greater acting depth in movies like <em>Say Anything&#8230;</em> and <em>Eight Men Out</em> than was ever required of him on <em>Fraiser</em>).</p>
<p>Oh hell yeah, baby. Let the treatment be in.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/actors/" title="actors" rel="tag">actors</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/dvd/" title="DVD" rel="tag">DVD</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/gabriel-byrne/" title="Gabriel Byrne" rel="tag">Gabriel Byrne</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/hbo/" title="HBO" rel="tag">HBO</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/in-treatment/" title="In Treatment" rel="tag">In Treatment</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/psychiatry/" title="psychiatry" rel="tag">psychiatry</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/recommendations/" title="recommendations" rel="tag">recommendations</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/shield/" title="The Shield" rel="tag">The Shield</a>, <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/tag/tv/" title="TV" rel="tag">TV</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/03/10/get-psyched-the-doctor-is-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

