<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up in the Air Dance Remix is Unsatisfying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:26:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-5189</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2082#comment-5189</guid>
		<description>Funny, but you&#039;re sounding suspiciously like a nice guy. Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that. ;-) It&#039;s not that I &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; commenters to be assholes, I&#039;m just a big proponent of lively debate. I&#039;ve also heard that controversy drives blog traffic. Maybe I need to be more provocative... heh, story of my life.

I don&#039;t recall assigning a rating to &lt;em&gt;Up in the Air&lt;/em&gt; anywhere... but like you say, who knows. Somebody could even have stolen my content, stuck a rating on the end of it and called it their own.

I fully intend to take your suggestion and watch the movie in its intended form. From what I could tell, I think I&#039;ll like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, but you&#8217;re sounding suspiciously like a nice guy. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that. <img src='http://cheekandbluster.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s not that I <em>want</em> commenters to be assholes, I&#8217;m just a big proponent of lively debate. I&#8217;ve also heard that controversy drives blog traffic. Maybe I need to be more provocative&#8230; heh, story of my life.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall assigning a rating to <em>Up in the Air</em> anywhere&#8230; but like you say, who knows. Somebody could even have stolen my content, stuck a rating on the end of it and called it their own.</p>
<p>I fully intend to take your suggestion and watch the movie in its intended form. From what I could tell, I think I&#8217;ll like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-5184</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2082#comment-5184</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s where I would usually politely apologize, and call it a day, but since you seem to enjoy my being an asshole, here I go:

I only called it a review because I remember seeing you associate a rating with it.Re-reading this post, it wasn&#039;t here, but I&#039;m almost positive you put a rating to it either on IMDb or wherever it was I read this post. If that was the case, I don&#039;t see how you could do that. But maybe I was mistaken and didn&#039;t actually see a rating... Who knows.
But if I may offer a suggestion- go check it out and DO watch it. Then review it (or make a post about it). You&#039;re missing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s where I would usually politely apologize, and call it a day, but since you seem to enjoy my being an asshole, here I go:</p>
<p>I only called it a review because I remember seeing you associate a rating with it.Re-reading this post, it wasn&#8217;t here, but I&#8217;m almost positive you put a rating to it either on IMDb or wherever it was I read this post. If that was the case, I don&#8217;t see how you could do that. But maybe I was mistaken and didn&#8217;t actually see a rating&#8230; Who knows.<br />
But if I may offer a suggestion- go check it out and DO watch it. Then review it (or make a post about it). You&#8217;re missing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-5181</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2082#comment-5181</guid>
		<description>Woohoo! &lt;em&gt;FINALLY&lt;/em&gt;. This blog has been suffering from a serious shortage of comment-thread smack from random haters. Josh, where have you been all my life?

Look, call my post &quot;horrendous&quot; all you want &#8212; just don&#039;t call it a review. It&#039;s not a review, it&#039;s a cheeky blog post about me slowly realizing that I had a faulty screener of &lt;em&gt;Up in the Air&lt;/em&gt; and feeling gypped about it.

Also, to be clear: I&#039;m not a movie critic. I&#039;m a blogger. (I&#039;m also a &lt;acronym title=&quot;Screen Actors Guild&quot;&gt;SAG&lt;/acronym&gt; member, which I mentioned at the beginning of the post in order to indicate why I receive any screeners at all.) True, I have posted a few &lt;a href=&quot;http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/01/18/whadja-think-rachel-getting-married/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;movie&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://cheekandbluster.com/2008/06/08/wile-e-coyote-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reviews&lt;/a&gt; before, but I don&#039;t think two or three reviews out of nearly 150 posts on this blog makes me a Film Critic.

As for your entreaty that I &quot;just review the movie, or shut up about it,&quot; I have a question: how the hell could I have written a review of &lt;em&gt;Up in the Air&lt;/em&gt;? I haven&#039;t &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;seen it&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;! As for shutting up about it... come on now. It&#039;s my blog, and I&#039;ll post on it whatever I feel like posting. If you don&#039;t like that, please remember that you are welcome to post comments telling me how much I suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! <em>FINALLY</em>. This blog has been suffering from a serious shortage of comment-thread smack from random haters. Josh, where have you been all my life?</p>
<p>Look, call my post &#8220;horrendous&#8221; all you want &mdash; just don&#8217;t call it a review. It&#8217;s not a review, it&#8217;s a cheeky blog post about me slowly realizing that I had a faulty screener of <em>Up in the Air</em> and feeling gypped about it.</p>
<p>Also, to be clear: I&#8217;m not a movie critic. I&#8217;m a blogger. (I&#8217;m also a <acronym title="Screen Actors Guild">SAG</acronym> member, which I mentioned at the beginning of the post in order to indicate why I receive any screeners at all.) True, I have posted a few <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2009/01/18/whadja-think-rachel-getting-married/" rel="nofollow">movie</a> <a href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2008/06/08/wile-e-coyote-and-the-kingdom-of-the-crystal-skull/" rel="nofollow">reviews</a> before, but I don&#8217;t think two or three reviews out of nearly 150 posts on this blog makes me a Film Critic.</p>
<p>As for your entreaty that I &#8220;just review the movie, or shut up about it,&#8221; I have a question: how the hell could I have written a review of <em>Up in the Air</em>? I haven&#8217;t <em><strong>seen it</strong></em>! As for shutting up about it&#8230; come on now. It&#8217;s my blog, and I&#8217;ll post on it whatever I feel like posting. If you don&#8217;t like that, please remember that you are welcome to post comments telling me how much I suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-5177</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2082#comment-5177</guid>
		<description>What a horrendous review... As a fellow film critic who gets many, many more than four screeners at awards season, it&#039;s just plain annoying to hear you proclaim your greatness... Just review the movie, or shut up about it.

And my screener copy played just fine, as did the print when I saw it at a screening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a horrendous review&#8230; As a fellow film critic who gets many, many more than four screeners at awards season, it&#8217;s just plain annoying to hear you proclaim your greatness&#8230; Just review the movie, or shut up about it.</p>
<p>And my screener copy played just fine, as did the print when I saw it at a screening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2010/01/18/up-in-the-air-dance-remix-is-unsatisfying/comment-page-1/#comment-5136</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/?p=2082#comment-5136</guid>
		<description>This proves what I had previously suspected: Paramount meant it as a personal slight. What the hell they think I did to them is anyone&#039;s guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proves what I had previously suspected: Paramount meant it as a personal slight. What the hell they think I did to them is anyone&#8217;s guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
