<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Punditry is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:16:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek Doran-Wood</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Doran-Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/index.php/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Ah, my Palo Altan friend, you&#039;ve been going to the wrong rallies.  I know entire theatre companies made up of hot left-wing women.  There are plenty of them around - they&#039;re just aware that punditry is dead.  Who wants to be lumped in with gargoyles like Bill O&#039;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh?  Not to mention that freaky nutjob John Gibson.  When I first saw a clip of him, I was like &quot;Holy shit, Fox News gave a job to that albino from &lt;em&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/em&gt;!&quot;

But if you insist on ideological parity among the female media, there&#039;s always the chick from CNN who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/24/ann-coulter-gets-her-freak-on/&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gave Coulter the O&#039;Reilly treatment&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, my Palo Altan friend, you&#8217;ve been going to the wrong rallies.  I know entire theatre companies made up of hot left-wing women.  There are plenty of them around &#8211; they&#8217;re just aware that punditry is dead.  Who wants to be lumped in with gargoyles like Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh?  Not to mention that freaky nutjob John Gibson.  When I first saw a clip of him, I was like &#8220;Holy shit, Fox News gave a job to that albino from <em>The Da Vinci Code</em>!&#8221;</p>
<p>But if you insist on ideological parity among the female media, there&#8217;s always the chick from CNN who <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/24/ann-coulter-gets-her-freak-on/"  rel="nofollow">gave Coulter the O&#8217;Reilly treatment</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron pugliese</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron pugliese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/index.php/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>The problem with the right wing media and why it is so popular is because face it they have all the hot chicks: Anne Coulter, Michelle Malkin... who do we have on the left as a counterpoint? And please don&#039;t say Janine Garafolo. Based on my experience at anti-war ralleys, left wing chicks are just not that smokin&#039;. On TV it&#039;s a lot harder to refute Anne Coulter when you&#039;re staring at her legs coming out of her  black mini-dress (or at least it makes you consider her inane thesis for a moment until you get back to reality). 

Of course more hot left wing chicks this will never happen because for the most part really attractive women are not interested anything but themselves... and then when they get older it&#039;s usually cause like &quot;Animal Rights&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the right wing media and why it is so popular is because face it they have all the hot chicks: Anne Coulter, Michelle Malkin&#8230; who do we have on the left as a counterpoint? And please don&#8217;t say Janine Garafolo. Based on my experience at anti-war ralleys, left wing chicks are just not that smokin&#8217;. On TV it&#8217;s a lot harder to refute Anne Coulter when you&#8217;re staring at her legs coming out of her  black mini-dress (or at least it makes you consider her inane thesis for a moment until you get back to reality). </p>
<p>Of course more hot left wing chicks this will never happen because for the most part really attractive women are not interested anything but themselves&#8230; and then when they get older it&#8217;s usually cause like &#8220;Animal Rights&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carter</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/index.php/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I second Sabina on both counts.  Love the &quot;bag of tricks&quot; reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Sabina on both counts.  Love the &#8220;bag of tricks&#8221; reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabina</title>
		<link>http://cheekandbluster.com/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheekandbluster.com/index.php/2006/08/14/punditry-is-dead/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I sincerely hope you are right!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I sincerely hope you are right!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
